Henry de Snaith

At first glance, Henry de Snaith seems to have no direct association with Howdenshire.  His life story appears to focus on Snaith, Selby and a variety of other ecclesiastical locations, although the high spot in his career must have been when he was appointed by Edward III to work at the Tower of London!

However, on 18th May 1366, Henry was granted the prebend of Howden by the King.  

So, how did we come across Henry's story?

While reading Alison Weir's excellent book, "Katherine Swynford, The Story of John of Gaunt and his Scandalous Duchess" I noticed a very intriguing sentence:  "On 1 September, (1369), Edward III commanded Henry de Snaith, guardian of 'our Great Wardrobe', to provide mourning garments for his family and the late Queen's servants."  (p.93)

Edward's wife, Queen Phillippa of Hainhault (c.1311-1369), had died on 14th August of that year.  Phillippa was the mother of, amongst others, Edward the Black Prince, and John of Gaunt.

But, who was Henry de Snaith?  As far as we know, there is only one place in this country called Snaith and, as 'de' often denotes a town of origin, does this mean that Henry came from Snaith?  If so, what was his story?  Can we find any more information about him?  What was his link to Edward III?

Well, it seems that the surname Snaith does, indeed, originate from Snaith in the East Riding of Yorkshire (previously West Riding).  The town isn't mentioned in its own right in the Domesday Book, but is recorded as 'Esneid' in reference to other places nearby.  It is recorded as 'Sneid' in the 1169 Pipe Rolls and as 'Snaith' in the early Yorkshire Charters of the 12th century. 

Early references to de Snaith, or Snayth, as a name occur in the 1379 Poll Tax Rolls in the name of Ricardus de Snayth and Alicia de Snayth.  However, over 100 years earlier a Henry de Snayth, tannator (tanner) appears as a Freeman of York during the second year of the reign of Edward I (c.1240).

So, who was the Henry de Snaith referred to by Alison Weir?   Did he, in fact, come from the little market town of Snaith?  If so, how did he end up working so close to King Edward III?

Snaith Priory

Our first point of call was Rev. Charles Best Robinson's 'History of the Priory and Peculiar of Snaith'.  This book, published in 1861, contains a lot of useful information ... and a lot of inaccuracies.  However, it is a good starting point and often leads us on to new lines of enquiry to follow.

According to the History of the Priory and Peculiar of Snaith, Pg 30-31, Henry Snayth founded a chantry in the church at Snaith for the benefit of the souls of Edward III , his parents, himself and John de Goldale, a monk of Selby.  This certainly suggests that Henry originated in the town!

"In 1380, Henry Snayth, clerk, who was a prebendary of Lincoln, Beverley, Howden, and York, gave by his will, dated at London, February 3rd, (and printed on p. Ill, of the Surtees' Society's first volume of York Wills,) to the altar of St. James, in the church of Snaith, "at which altar exists a chantry, which I have founded in perpetuity, two pair of vestments, that is to say, one for holidays, and the other for a chaplain, who shall celebrate there constantly, a chalice, with two silver phials, a missal, and a psalter, as is more fully contained in a certain agreement made between the said abbot and convent of Selby and myself. And I will that the said vestments be made at my charge, that is to say, one of russet cloth of silk, and the other of fusten, with certain ' garters ' placed on it." Besides founding this chantry, for the greater decency of which he makes this minute provision, he gave a hundred marks for the restoration [building of the choir] of the monastery of Selby, on condition that they should specially recommend in their prayers the souls of his parents, "of king Edward the III., of me Henry,'', and of brother John de Goldale, formerly a fellow-monk with me of the said monastery. Also, I bequeath to the same monastery £40, to be expended, as well in the purchase of one house at Snayth for the priests to live together in, as in expenses due to the archbishop and his clergy, in writing, and in any other manner, for the supply of the needs of the said chantry."

So, unpicking the above, we discover some very interesting facts:

The choir in the East End of Selby Abbey

According to this plan of Snaith Priory from a Guide Book to the Church, dated circa 1901, location 5 may indicate the position of the Chantry Altar of St James.  

"The Altar of Saint James, founded in 1380 by the Revd. Henry Snaith, Prebendary of  York, Lincoln, Beverley and Howden, evidently an ecclesiastic  who was born at Snaith, and probably educated in the adjacent Monastery of Selby.  Judging from his Will he was a rich man.  Apparently he gratefully remembered  the place of his birth.  This Altar had, at its suppression, an endowment equal to about £60 a year of present money (c.1900) (Approx £5,000 in 2021) ...

The endowments of the Chantry Altars, as set out in the document relating to them on their suppression, would not be the only remuneration of the Chantry Priests, who would probably have, in addition, fees  for "obits", "certains" and other services, and for school teaching.  An "obit" was saying service on the anniversary of persons' deaths.  A "certain" was saying a short prayer at Mass, on Sundays, for certain persons by name.

The position of the Altar of St James cannot now be traced.  There was, apparently, an Altar against the East side of the North Transept, as there are remains of a piscina in the wall of the window, partly hidden by the organ.  This may have been the site of the Altar of St James, which the good prebendary of so many places (Henry Snaith)  endowed, and to which by his Will he lovingly gave vestments, chalice, missal and psalter."

After the suppression of the monasteries in 1536 and 1539, local people were scared that the Church possessions would be removed and so they apparently took things into their own hands and took much of the silver, etc., out of the Church and hid it away.  (I wonder whether any of these treasures still exist?)  The remainder of the Chantry goods - presumably including those bequeathed by Henry de Snaith - were seized by order in 1546.  However, in a return of 1552, Snaith Church still retained 20 sets of beautiful vestments, worth over £10,000 in modern money.  Sadly, these were removed soon after.  Even the gold and silver chalices were taken and the Church was left virtually bare.

But we're moving ahead of ourselves!  We need to take a step back and look at Henry's route to the household of King Edward III ...

Remains of the 12th-century Wardrobe Tower at the Tower of London 

The Royal Wardrobe was a storehouse for royal clothing, arms and other personal items. Edward III moved it from the Tower of London to a house just north of what is now Queen Victoria Street. It was destroyed in the Great Fire. Initially the Wardrobe held ceremonial robes for all the royal family for state occasions, and other furnishings and robes for the King's ministers. 

The following list gives an indication of the type of weaponry, etc., stored in the Royal Wardrobe:

On 10th June 1363, Reynold de Shouldham, the King's 'searcher of ships and boats in the port of London and water of the Thames', was ordered to deliver to 'the king's clerk, Henry de Snayth, keeper of the great wardrobe, all the cloths (later described as a fardel of linen cloths) and other contents of a certain bale which he arrested as forfeit to the king' from the boat of Peter Gossyn, which was crossing to Calais.  Three days later, Reynold was instructed to release the ship, which is described as a 'hakeboat' from Flanders, on receipt of payment to the Chancery of £10 (approximately £5,000 nowadays) by Peter Gossyn.

Interestingly, this incident may have come under the Navigation Act of the time, by which a vessel would not be forfeited if only an insignificant part of the cargo contravened the Act.  In fact, in 1363 new legislation came into effect in relation to such seizures of boats and ships:

"Whereas the ships of diverse people of the realm, be arrested and holden forfeit, because of a little thing put into their ship not customed, whereof the owners of the ship be ignorant; it is accorded and assented, that no owner shall lose his ship for such a small thing put within his ship, not customed, without his knowledge."

So, was Peter unaware that someone had sneaked an extra bundle of cloth onboard his ship?  Looking at the size of his fine, it seems unlikely.  But who are we to judge, almost 700 years later?!

Such arrests weren't confined to cloth, as may be seen in the Calendar of Fine Rolls one year later, when Reynold de Shouldham delivered to Henry a selection of pewter vessels and 62 dozen bowstrings, together with bundles of woollen cloths. 27 pieces of silver were also delivered to the King's Treasurer.  Quite a haul!

It has been reported on various websites that Henry became Chancellor of the Exchequer in 1371.  This intrigued us, as his name seems to be missing from most lists of 14th century Chancellors.  

But is this because we are were thinking of this as a modern Chancellor, perhaps?  It seems that the role was quite different in the 14th century.

A chancery or chancellery (Latin: cancellaria) was a medieval writing office, responsible for the production of official documents.  The title of Chancellor, for the head of the office, came to be held by important ministers.  

The office of Chancellery was one of the two main administrative offices, along with the Exchequer. It began as part of the royal household, but by the 13th-century was separate from the household and was located at Westminster. It produced all the charters and writs, which were all sealed with the Great Seal.

The office was headed by the Chancellor of England, and was staffed by royal clerks. It came into existence shortly before the Norman Conquest of England, and was retained by King William I of England after the Conquest. 

We might well be wrong, but our feeling is that it is unlikely that Henry was either Chancellor of the Exchequer or Chancellor of England.  It seems more likely to us that he was a royal clerk or even Chancellor of the medieval writing office.  This was undoubtedly an important role - for instance, clerks were often employed to write letters and petitions to the king.  

But we will continue to search for proof to confirm or refute our humble opinion on this matter :-).  

From a Memorandum of Acknowledgement in the Calendar of Close Rolls, dated 10th November 1379, we know that Henry was Sir William's clerk by this time.  Is it possible that he was responsible for the following petition from Sir William to Richard II, dated between 1378 and 1380?:

"William de Wyndesore and Alice his wife state that by a judgment brought in parliament against Alice, they were deprived of their lands and tenements, goods and chattels, and ask that they, and those enfeoffed with lands and tenements to Alice's use, might be restored to these lands and tenements, goods and chattels, and to their losses by this judgment, and that Alice might be restored to her previous estate; and also that William might be pardoned his suit of the King's peace, and all other things which could harm him through Alice - considering that although the judgment was brought against Alice as a single woman, she was at that time William's wife, and considering also William's service to the King's father and grandfather."  TNA Ref: SC 8/146/7265

(https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C9209448)

Considering the date of this petition and the fact that Henry de Snaith was clerk to Sir William de Wyndesore at this time, it does seem a distinct possibility that he actually constructed and wrote this petition.  

If so, is this an image of the handwriting of Henry de Snaith?!

Looking at the handwriting on the following document, dated 1377-c. 1383, we noticed that the handwriting looks very similar to that of the William de Wyndesore petition.

This document is an excerpt of a petition brought by Henry de Snaith regarding a dispute over the prebend of St James in the collegiate church of Beverley.  Henry is saying that the money is rightfully his, but it is being claimed by Hugh Ferriby.  (A prebend is the portion of the revenues of a cathedral or collegiate church formerly granted to a canon or member of the chapter as his stipend.)

Considering that the petition was brought by Henry in person and that his occupation is given as 'Clerk', together with the similarities seen in the formation of many of the letters, it seems quite possible to us that this could possibly be another example of the handwriting of Henry de Snaith!  What do you think?

TNA Ref: SC 8/139/6945

(https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C9209129 )